Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
You may not think about it while you’re checking your wall or uploading photos from your weekend bash, but it takes a lot of juice to keep Facebook up and running. The social networking site needs a lot of cloud-based computing power to keep more than 500 million active users occupied at work and sadly many of these machines are powered by coal based electricity. Greenpeace is upping their campaign against Facebook’s methods and have asked them to dump dirty electricity by Earth Day.
Their theory is simple, if a giant firm like Facebook can demand clean energy other IT companies will follow suit. The main focus of their campaign are two data centers located in Oregon and North Carolina; each center takes up about 300,000 square feet and 62% of their power comes from burning coal. Coal not only has a nasty effect on the environment but it also compromises your health. According to a report from the UN, coal contributes to 24,000 premature deaths in the US each year.
Greenpeace has a history of using childish stunts (and William Shatner) to get the word out, but the Facebook campaign they started in 2010 is certainly more grown-up. They latched onto the power of the social networking site and got almost 100,000 users to sign up for a page that urges the company to “Unfriend Coal” by implementing the following practices:
Last week, Greenpeace upped their game and started running ads that targeted Facebook’s own employees with an “Unfriend Coal” TV ad that ran in Palo Alto, California, where the company’s headquarters are located.
Greenpeace has slated April 21, 2011 as the kickoff of their Green:Net series with a special focus on their “Facebook: Unfriend Coal” campaign. Even if Facebook doesn’t cave before then, the eco-minded group will be holding discussions on how other companies like Apple are using green energy to juice up their cloud computer systems.
As energy prices rise it may be a very smart move for Facebook to invest in green energy. For instance, Google spends about $38 million a year just to power their data centers. To offset some of that cost they’ve invested in a wind farm project in Iowa which may give them dirt cheap energy rates in the future. In the UK, HP decided to build a data center that was cooled by the cold winds of the North Sea instead of a using pollutant spewing air conditioners; the technology will save them $5.6 million a year in energy costs for a 43,055 sq. ft. facility.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.

Comments
I like that Greenpeace is looking out for our best interest (I.e never affilliated with any government or business). I also like that they get companies to actually do something about their dirty habits, instead of just selling them a meaningless certification or seal of approval like some other NGOs seem to do. So I support what GP is requesting from FB. Anyway, why shouldn't facebook invest in green energy? They can definitely afford it! And having made all their gazillion dollars from social networking, it seems in their best interest to do what they can to protect the society that does all said socializing.
Facebook must really take the lead to clean energy. This is a great initiative from Greenpeace because many people are still clueless about the fact that their favorite social networking site is powered by dirty coal. I hope Facebook would do their part for the environment and cleanup their act. Zuckerberg must start going beyond just connecting people, thus connect people via clean energy. :)